Kommentare zu: Pitfalls with Table.ColumnsOfType https://ssbi-blog.de/blog/technical-topics-english/pitfalls-with-table-columnsoftype/ Wir lieben Microsoft Power BI Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:43:50 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1 Von: David Whitney https://ssbi-blog.de/blog/technical-topics-english/pitfalls-with-table-columnsoftype/#comment-5684 Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:01:09 +0000 https://ssbi-blog.de/?p=5764#comment-5684 Hervorragend. Saved my ass.

]]>
Von: Erivaldo Lopes https://ssbi-blog.de/blog/technical-topics-english/pitfalls-with-table-columnsoftype/#comment-5565 Thu, 22 Feb 2024 20:54:19 +0000 https://ssbi-blog.de/?p=5764#comment-5565 Hi Lars,
Thanks for this post. It has helped me with my table transformations and pin-point errors.
By the way, is there a difference between nullable types and non-nullable types?

]]>
Von: Ron https://ssbi-blog.de/blog/technical-topics-english/pitfalls-with-table-columnsoftype/#comment-5195 Thu, 02 Nov 2023 12:12:52 +0000 https://ssbi-blog.de/?p=5764#comment-5195 Thanks for your insight. However, I have a table with mixed „type number“ and „type any“. „Table.ColumnsOfType(#“Changed Type“,{type nullable any})“ (or „Table.ColumnsOfType(#“Changed Type“,{type any})“) return ALL of the column names. Is there any simple way of returning ONLY those columns of „type any“? (Other than removing the other columns from the generated list)?

]]>
Von: Lars Schreiber https://ssbi-blog.de/blog/technical-topics-english/pitfalls-with-table-columnsoftype/#comment-2999 Wed, 05 Jan 2022 21:04:10 +0000 https://ssbi-blog.de/?p=5764#comment-2999 Als Antwort auf Justin Hylton.

Happy I could help 🙂

]]>
Von: Justin Hylton https://ssbi-blog.de/blog/technical-topics-english/pitfalls-with-table-columnsoftype/#comment-2982 Thu, 30 Dec 2021 15:48:24 +0000 https://ssbi-blog.de/?p=5764#comment-2982 Thank you for this article, I was so confused why Table.ColumnsOfType was returning weird results for me.

]]>
Von: Lars Schreiber https://ssbi-blog.de/blog/technical-topics-english/pitfalls-with-table-columnsoftype/#comment-852 Tue, 11 Feb 2020 07:50:08 +0000 https://ssbi-blog.de/?p=5764#comment-852 Als Antwort auf Mark Biegert.

Hi Mark,

thanks for your feedback. Happy, that it helped you out 🙂

Cheers,
Lars

]]>
Von: Mark Biegert https://ssbi-blog.de/blog/technical-topics-english/pitfalls-with-table-columnsoftype/#comment-851 Mon, 10 Feb 2020 18:16:08 +0000 https://ssbi-blog.de/?p=5764#comment-851 Very helpful. Great presentation. Thanks.

]]>
Von: Lars Schreiber https://ssbi-blog.de/blog/technical-topics-english/pitfalls-with-table-columnsoftype/#comment-622 Sat, 10 Aug 2019 05:17:48 +0000 https://ssbi-blog.de/?p=5764#comment-622 Als Antwort auf Curt Hagenlocher.

Why didn’t I think of that on my own? * irony off… Curt, as always, thanks a lot for the clarification

]]>
Von: Curt Hagenlocher https://ssbi-blog.de/blog/technical-topics-english/pitfalls-with-table-columnsoftype/#comment-621 Fri, 09 Aug 2019 16:27:58 +0000 https://ssbi-blog.de/?p=5764#comment-621 „type nullable any“ and „type any“ are the same value. The complement to „any“ is „anynonnull“ — that is, „type nullable anynonnull“ is the same as type „any“.

]]>