Kommentare zu: Writing documentation for custom M-functions, Part1 https://ssbi-blog.de/blog/technical-topics-english/writing-documentation-for-custom-m-functions-part1/ Wir lieben Microsoft Power BI Fri, 22 Mar 2024 16:27:35 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8 Von: James https://ssbi-blog.de/blog/technical-topics-english/writing-documentation-for-custom-m-functions-part1/#comment-981 Sun, 03 May 2020 16:47:12 +0000 http://ssbi-blog.de/?p=2960#comment-981 Thanks for the series. This is a lot easier to understand than Microsoft’s documentation.

]]> Von: Lars Schreiber https://ssbi-blog.de/blog/technical-topics-english/writing-documentation-for-custom-m-functions-part1/#comment-176 Mon, 12 Feb 2018 08:24:29 +0000 http://ssbi-blog.de/?p=2960#comment-176 Als Antwort auf Igor Cotruta.

Hey Igor,

very nice hearing from you. You beat me with the „official“ documentation. At the end of my third article I will mention the sources I have worked with and the link you mentioned is of course included 🙂 Thank you for adding the datatype of Documentation.Example{i}[Result].

Always appreciate your comments.

Cheers,
Lars

]]> Von: Igor Cotruta https://ssbi-blog.de/blog/technical-topics-english/writing-documentation-for-custom-m-functions-part1/#comment-175 Mon, 12 Feb 2018 07:22:33 +0000 http://ssbi-blog.de/?p=2960#comment-175 Hei Lars,
Good thing that you’ve started these series about documentation. Hopefully it will start some good conversations around the topic and how to improve it.
I wanted to add a few things. Firstly the „official“ documentation on documentation is hidden in one of the github pages on data connectors : https://github.com/Microsoft/DataConnectors/blob/master/docs/function-docs.md
Secondly, the Documentation.Examples{i}[Result] is of type text.
Thanks,
Igor

]]> Von: Vitaly https://ssbi-blog.de/blog/technical-topics-english/writing-documentation-for-custom-m-functions-part1/#comment-168 Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:00:50 +0000 http://ssbi-blog.de/?p=2960#comment-168 The straightforward approach (version 1) is rather clunky, so I’m really excited about version 2! Will be waiting to see what you have come up with! Thanks.

]]>